Have you been following the case of the Kenyan mom who sued Rusinga School for kicking her son out of class because of his dreadlocks?
Well, the ruling was made this week and here is how it went, as reported in The Star.
“A six-year-old boy who sued Rusinga School after he was ordered to cut off dreadlocks has lost his legal battle to keep his long hair.
In a judgment yesterday, High Court judge Mumbi Ngugi dismissed the case on grounds that he failed to convince court that his culture and religious rights had been violated.
Ngugi said it was clear the boy’s mother wanted him to keep dreadlocks for fashion and not religious reasons as she had alleged. She said the mother knew all along, since she enrolled him at the school’s kindergarten in 2010, that dreadlocks are not permitted.
Ngugi said the mother signed the school’s code of conduct agreeing to observe rules and regulations. The judge’s decision means the boy who has missed school since September 7, will have to either cut off his hair to enable him resume school or look for another school that will accommodate his style. The boy’s mother went to court protesting that the schools directive to have her son’s hair chopped off was discriminative.
She told justice Ngugi that her son completed the four-year kindergarten school without complications, but when he reported on September 7 to enroll in the preparatory school he was told he could not be accepted until he cut his hair.
She argued that the boy’s father is Jamaican and the dreadlocks are part of his culture. The mother wanted the school to be compelled to accept the boy back, saying the decision is illegal as it discriminates on gender, religious and cultural grounds.
The school, however, said it is a Christian school and does not accept boys to have dreadlocks. In her ruling, Ngugi said courts have no desire in interfering with the running of institutions, adding that schools must be allowed to govern their pupils.
“The petitioner has not shown this court that the child practices Rastafarian religion, had she proved this, she could have persuaded this court,” she said.”
What do you think about the whole issue? Do you think the boy had a valid case? Or do you think the judge was fair in her decision? What do you think of the mother’s decision to pursue this case legally? Would you have done the same thing?
*top image: justice mumbi ngugi
Parenting!!! We as parents are contributing to a larger extent towards our children’s unbecoming behaviour. We are ordered by God to guide and safe guard our children through proper up bringing. I admired what judge Ngugi said “institutions must be allowed to govern their pupils”. We need to teach our children to respect the systems put in place. For God sake the boy is only 6 years old with all the innocence in the world. So who’s idea was it to grow the dreadlocks?? The mother’s or his? What were the likely consequences? The first time I read the story I was like what???? Call me old school, analogue I would not allow my son to do it at such an age especially school going. It’s taking him to the barber shop for Jordan pap! If he wants to he can do it later in life. Kwenye tunaelekea we might hear of a case of a parent suing a school coz of bling bling in school. How I miss the parenting of them days. Rules had to be followed at home, school etc. I usually say tulikuwa tunapewa discipline kwa kijiko. We rise up and stop playing on seeing an older person approaching us.
No..the mother and the boy have no case in my opinion..My house,my rules..Shape up or ship out.Let they get another school..No need to drag this boy to some imagined freedoms where codes of conducts and school rules exist.
Let the mother look onather school for his son……or to follow rules and regulations